FDA won't hold companies responsible for independent user content on their social media properties

U.S. pharmaceutical companies may have gotten off easy compared to other areas of the world, said Peter Pitts, president of the Center for Medicine in the Public Interest and a former associate commissioner at the FDA.

The European Court of Justice recently ruled that online remarks about drugs posted by a third party on the manufacturer's Web property could constitute advertising, even though the post's author has no connection with the product's manufacturer or marketer.

“That's carte blanche for an almost complete gag order on anyone who wants to discuss anything to do with medicines,” Pitts said.
Sign Up for Our Email Newsletter

RECENT NEWS

Managed Care Magazine Launches Attack on Orphans

Managed Care Magazine Launches Attack on Orphans

As the FDALawBlog points out, in some cases, a single orphan drug designation can result in multiple periods of orphan dr...  Read more

Cut FDA red tape so doctors can better treat patients

Cut FDA red tape so doctors can better treat patients

Off-label prescribing has already has saved thousands of lives. The FDA ought to make it easier for doctors and patients ...  Read more

A Social Media Manifesto
  • Journal of Commercial Biotechnology
  • 01/01/2014

A Social Media Manifesto

...  Read more

DRUGWONKS BLOG