FDA won't hold companies responsible for independent user content on their social media properties

U.S. pharmaceutical companies may have gotten off easy compared to other areas of the world, said Peter Pitts, president of the Center for Medicine in the Public Interest and a former associate commissioner at the FDA.

The European Court of Justice recently ruled that online remarks about drugs posted by a third party on the manufacturer's Web property could constitute advertising, even though the post's author has no connection with the product's manufacturer or marketer.

“That's carte blanche for an almost complete gag order on anyone who wants to discuss anything to do with medicines,” Pitts said.
Sign Up for Our Email Newsletter

RECENT NEWS

AARP's Stop Rx Greed Campaign Should Focus on AARP's Rx Greed

AARP's Stop Rx Greed Campaign Should Focus on AARP's Rx Greed

...  Read more

FDA is smashing the status quo for regulatory science

FDA is smashing the status quo for regulatory science

The most potent way the FDA can enable innovation is by being a partner in advancing new approaches to both drug developm...  Read more

True Cost of Socialized Medicine & the Right Way to Hold Down the Cost of Healthcare

True Cost of Socialized Medicine & the Right Way to Hold Down the Cost of Healthcare

...  Read more

DRUGWONKS BLOG