FDA won't hold companies responsible for independent user content on their social media properties

U.S. pharmaceutical companies may have gotten off easy compared to other areas of the world, said Peter Pitts, president of the Center for Medicine in the Public Interest and a former associate commissioner at the FDA.

The European Court of Justice recently ruled that online remarks about drugs posted by a third party on the manufacturer's Web property could constitute advertising, even though the post's author has no connection with the product's manufacturer or marketer.

“That's carte blanche for an almost complete gag order on anyone who wants to discuss anything to do with medicines,” Pitts said.
Sign Up for Our Email Newsletter

RECENT NEWS

We Can Fight Fraud Without Threatening Access to Care

We Can Fight Fraud Without Threatening Access to Care

When Washington fails to police its own programs, it’s hardworking Americans that pay the price. ...  Read more

Big Apple Hospital CEOs are Cooking the Not-for-Profit Hospital Books

Big Apple Hospital CEOs are Cooking the Not-for-Profit Hospital Books

There is something almost too neat—too polished—about the way not-for-profit hospitals tell their financial story. It is...  Read more

Modernizing North Carolina's Nonprofit Social Contract

Modernizing North Carolina's Nonprofit Social Contract

Nonprofit hospitals occupy a uniquely privileged position in the American healthcare system. Their exemption from federal...  Read more

DRUGWONKS BLOG