FDA won't hold companies responsible for independent user content on their social media properties

U.S. pharmaceutical companies may have gotten off easy compared to other areas of the world, said Peter Pitts, president of the Center for Medicine in the Public Interest and a former associate commissioner at the FDA.

The European Court of Justice recently ruled that online remarks about drugs posted by a third party on the manufacturer's Web property could constitute advertising, even though the post's author has no connection with the product's manufacturer or marketer.

“That's carte blanche for an almost complete gag order on anyone who wants to discuss anything to do with medicines,” Pitts said.
Sign Up for Our Email Newsletter

RECENT NEWS

The Spreading Cancer of Counterfeit Drugs
  • CMPI
  • 10/01/2020 12:00 AM

The Spreading Cancer of Counterfeit Drugs

Just as the coronavirus mutates to survive and thrive, so to do the purveyors of counterfeit medicines -- with their high...  Read more

$40 price tag for potential coronavirus vaccine seems to be ‘right on the money,’ says think tank

$40 price tag for potential coronavirus vaccine seems to be ‘right on the money,’ says think tank

If a potential coronavirus vaccine is not affordable, too many people will not get vaccinated, says Peter Pitts, presiden...  Read more

Former FDA Associate Commissioner Says FDA Made Right Move to Authorize Convalescent Plasma

Former FDA Associate Commissioner Says FDA Made Right Move to Authorize Convalescent Plasma

Peter Pitts, President for the Center For Medicine in the Public Interest, explains why he believes the FDA authorized th...  Read more

DRUGWONKS BLOG